Do we Observe the Same Categories of Attachment Habits Certainly one of People that individuals Observe Certainly one of Children?

Do we Observe the Same Categories of Attachment Habits Certainly one of People that individuals Observe Certainly one of Children?

The initial browse toward adult connection involved looking at the organization ranging from individual variations in adult connection and in what way someone remember the relationships in addition to their memory for just what its dating with their moms and dads are just like

Hazan and you may Razor (1987) establish an easy questionnaire determine such individual differences. (These types of private variations are usually called accessory appearances, accessory models, connection orientations, or variations in the business of your own accessory system.) Basically, Hazan and you will Shaver requested research subjects to learn the three sentences listed below, and you can suggest and therefore section better distinguisheded the way they consider, become, and act into the intimate dating:

An effective. I’m somewhat uncomfortable becoming near to anyone else; I find it difficult to believe him or her entirely, tough to create me personally so you’re able to count on her or him. I’m worried when individuals will get as well romantic, and frequently, other people need us to be more intimate than just Personally i think comfortable becoming.

B. I’ve found it relatively easy to find close to others and in the morning safe dependent on her or him and achieving him or her count on me. I really don’t value getting quit or just around anybody taking also close to me personally.

C. I find one anyone else is unwilling to get as near while the I’d like. We tend to proper care that my partner doesn’t fancy me personally or wouldn’t should stay with me. I want to get extremely near to my spouse, and therefore possibly frightens somebody aside.

Considering which around three-class level, Hazan and Shaver unearthed that this new shipment regarding categories is comparable to that found in infancy. Put simply, in the sixty% off grownups classified themselves as the secure (paragraph B), regarding 20% demonstrated by themselves as the avoidant (part Good), and you may regarding the 20% explained themselves while the stressed-resistant (part C).

Although this measure supported due to the fact a good solution to studies the latest connection between connection looks and you may relationships doing work, it did not ensure it is the full sample of one’s hypothesis the exact same kinds of personal variations noticed in babies might be reveal one of grownups

(In ways, the latest Hazan and you can Shaver size presumed so it to be real.) Further research has browsed so it theory in a variety of ways. Such as, Kelly Brennan and her colleagues amassed numerous statements (e.g., “In my opinion that other people could well be here in my situation when i you desire them”) and analyzed just how these types of statements “hang with her” statistically (Brennan, Clark, Razor, 1998). Brennan’s conclusions recommended that there are a few practical dimensions in accordance to mature attachment models (see Shape 2). That vital varying has been branded accessory-relevant nervousness. Individuals who rating at the top of so it adjustable tend to care whether the partner can be acquired, responsive, conscious, etc. People who score on lower end associated with changeable try better in the seen responsiveness of its partners. The other crucial changeable is known as attachment-relevant protection. Anybody into higher end of dimensions favor not to rely on other people or start so you can others. Some one into the reduced prevent for the dimensions are more safe becoming intimate with people consequently they are better dependant on and with anybody else rely on her or him. A good prototypical secure adult try low into the Thai dating those two dimensions.

Brennan’s findings are critical since the previous analyses of your own statistical patterning off conclusion one of infants regarding strange situation show two functionally equivalent proportions: the one that grabs variability in the nervousness and you can resistance of kid plus one one to catches variability about children’s desire to help you use the parent as the a safe refuge to have service (look for Fraley Spieker, 2003a, 2003b). Functionally, such size is similar to the a few-proportions bare among grownups, recommending one to similar habits out of attachment exist within some other facts in living.

Leave a Comment

อีเมลของคุณจะไม่แสดงให้คนอื่นเห็น ช่องข้อมูลจำเป็นถูกทำเครื่องหมาย *